«
»
 

Olbermann addresses today’s awful Supreme Court ruling on corporate campaign funding

Written by Mike on January 21st, 2010

This is a huge deal. We have just sold out politicians to an even higher level of corporate influence. I think this is one even Graggor will agree with.

Today was a very bad day for America. The Supreme Court is insane.

Part II

  • Digg

Posted in Politics |

8 Comments so far ↓

  1. Greg Farber says:
    January 23, 2010 at 8:56 am

    To funny, this diatribe by this propagandist who poked fun at another propagandist (Faux Entertainment) Just perfectly described the history of this nation since FDR. Of course the Roman Catholic John Roberts would make it “legal” at this stage of their game.. Not lawful mind you. Mike, do a little historical research, ask yourself this, who was in control of mankind during the pre Reformation era known as the Dark Ages ? Who developed their counter, or Anti Reformationist agenda 500 years ago to defeat the Reformation and return mankind back to those Dark Ages ? Why do Democratic and Republican politicians whether they be Senators, Congressmen, or Presidents, or other World leaders kiss the hand of the Pope ? Just being nice I suppose, just a huge world of nothing but coincidences.. You Betcha..

    You see my young friend, I want to steal your mind away from those cretins and return it to its rightful owner, that would be YOU.

    The left right paradigm is for mental midgets.. Don’t be one no more..

  2. Mike says:
    January 23, 2010 at 9:46 pm

    Greg – I figured you would be against foreign corporations being able to influence U.S. elections. That’s what the Supreme Court just allowed.

  3. Greg Farber says:
    January 23, 2010 at 11:19 pm

    True, but realistically a foreign corporation has been influencing the u.s. gov corporation elections for many decades. 14 decades actually. Not to mention 9 decades via their Federal Reserve Franchise or shall we say privately owned bank under the control of the World Bank.. Same thing. Jefferson and Monroe warned of this in 1823 with the Monroe Doctrine.. Nice to see you and Olbermann catching up with history.

  4. Jim K says:
    January 25, 2010 at 8:44 am

    The sad part is that voters feel that they actually have a choice in selecting the president. Well, we do get to pay eenie, meenie, minie and moe before we get to call heads or tails. But in reality, those candidates have been preselected by wealth and influence well before they get to the primaries. If there are any good candidates, they usually get weeded out because they could not outspend the competition. I don’t see how this will affect corporate (or foreign country/company) sponsorship other than they can now give more money openly with less fear of breaking campaign contribution laws. Can you say 你好, Ni hao? That’s hello in Chinese. Talk about those who really like to devastate the environment and wildlife. Look what they have done to their own country. They prop up the panda bear (the national poster pet–I must admit I do like pandas), kill off the tigers, flood their valleys and ancient shrines, and their state sponsored factories pollute at will (just like in Russia and many former soviet block counties) with no public recourse or accountability. I’m glad to be an American but I too want to keep our country as free from foreign influence as possible. Even though I have traveled to asia, and europe and south america (many times), there is no place I would rather be than here in the U.S., where we still have many freedoms. Let’s just not give up anymore freedom.

  5. Greg Farber says:
    January 25, 2010 at 11:51 am

    Agreed Jim, that is why a continually point to the Agenda 21 Sustainable Development which is a Soviet model and has been installed nation wide in states and counties, and it the foundation of the new environmentalism movement officially since 1992, with links to 1966 documents, and it is the United Nations, period. And the documentation involved including Congressional Globes, annals and Records of Congress, and U.N. documents themselves prove me right, and I point to the world bankers and this debt we have..That is why i believe the enviro movement is based on fraud and the resources are collateral for that foreign debt. The elite bankers and politicians used our heart felt affection for these lands we love to install this self protectionism of their political collateral.. PERIOD. Unfortunately several among us will learn of this deception way to late.. I think it is to late now actually.. “it’s all just one big coincidence ” no one one could be this devious..” As I roll my eyes and contemplate giving up on telling the truth to people who refuse to listen and or verify it.. That said I’m heading out to enjoy five foot powder drifts again today north of Ktown..

  6. Jim K says:
    January 25, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    Well, there nothing wrong with ecotourism, or minimizing access roads in wilderness areas, or sustainable forestry practices, or……but here is the issue. Many eco industries benefit from intelligent, sustainable exploitation of various resources provided that rational conservation practices are followed. Logging trees that are about to die (before the beetle gets them) supports the timber industry and provides incomes. Leaving treees that need many more years to grow until they can be harvested has several positive latent effects on various wildlife. Not cutting trees that are rare helps ensure the species survival (some old growth trees are very rare and should not be harvested). Some trees can be planted for the sole purpose of harvesting but in the meantime they have a positive environmental effect–i.e., wildlife habitat, prevention of erosion, emitting oxygen, etc., etc. Of course deer, elk, moose elk like open (forested) areas in woodlands because it helps promote grow of new trees and can provide them with a food source. Of course, herds of grazing animals in the mountains also helps keep wolves in the mountains and further away from flatter agriculture lands. Personally, I think it would be great if oil drilling is kept out of the ANWR but today’s technolgoy would alllow it to be done with less impact on the environment and the resulting footprint would be minimal now that horizontal and vertical drilling is possible from one platform or series of concentrated drilling locations. Of course, most of the oil that is taken from Alaska already gets sold to Asia and wouldn’t do much for our dependence on foreign oil, but here is another consideration. An offshore drilling rig, several miles offshore from Alaska in international waters, could technically (or within a few years) be possible and who knows what country might be sitting out there tapping the oil in the ANWR so a U.S. company might as well do it as long as they are held accountable for any environmental damage. It’s great to be environmentally conscious but if companies can make a profit by practicing environmental ways of doing business everyone wins and the long term sustenance of our resources and wildlife increases in perpetuity.

  7. Greg Farber says:
    January 25, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    I would like to see further studies in the electrical theory’s of Nikola Tesla, Henry Moray, John Searl, etc. etc. I believe that would be the right direction for mankind to go in, I believe the truths of those studies have been suppressed, and if those ever escape that suppression I believe it will not be worth it to pump oil out of the ground any longer, thus those oil barons have every devious reason to interfere in this electrical science and have done so.. The motor generator which does not need fuel and can power itself has been studied for over 100 years.. And is a reality.. It is time for the world to know it..
    http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm

  8. Greg Farber says:
    January 25, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    These six youtube videos are a nice demonstration.
    Steorn’s Orbo Electromagnetic motors
    http://candidconservatives.com/steorns-orbo-electromagnetic-motors/#comment-402

Leave a Comment