<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The National Park Service: Putting their money where their mouth is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wilderness-sportsman.com/wsblog/2009/06/22/the-national-park-service-putting-their-money-where-their-mouth-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wilderness-sportsman.com/wsblog/2009/06/22/the-national-park-service-putting-their-money-where-their-mouth-is/</link>
	<description>...your public lands. This blog is wind powered and carbon neutral.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.wilderness-sportsman.com/wsblog/2009/06/22/the-national-park-service-putting-their-money-where-their-mouth-is/#comment-41312</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilderness-sportsman.com/wsblog/?p=6046#comment-41312</guid>
		<description>Bob - I do agree that hybrids are not the perfect solution. But, they are an evolution towards the perfect solution. Because of that, I believe those vehicles deserve free entrance to national parks. You are right that many hybrids are outdone by non-hybrids. That&#039;s why I put in hybrid passenger cars only.

I also think that hybrids and high MPG passenger cars are the superior vehicles while in the parks. They do much better at the average posted speeds of 25, 35 and 45. They also do not obstruct others views like the larger vehicles, often causing visibility issues at animal casued traffic jams(Yellowstone for example).

Definitely not perfect like you say. But truly an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; I do agree that hybrids are not the perfect solution. But, they are an evolution towards the perfect solution. Because of that, I believe those vehicles deserve free entrance to national parks. You are right that many hybrids are outdone by non-hybrids. That&#8217;s why I put in hybrid passenger cars only.</p>
<p>I also think that hybrids and high MPG passenger cars are the superior vehicles while in the parks. They do much better at the average posted speeds of 25, 35 and 45. They also do not obstruct others views like the larger vehicles, often causing visibility issues at animal casued traffic jams(Yellowstone for example).</p>
<p>Definitely not perfect like you say. But truly an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.wilderness-sportsman.com/wsblog/2009/06/22/the-national-park-service-putting-their-money-where-their-mouth-is/#comment-41291</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilderness-sportsman.com/wsblog/?p=6046#comment-41291</guid>
		<description>I have to partially disagree with your logic on this one.  There are several vehicles that get better fuel economy than any hybrid currently on the market.  In addition, why should hybrids get a free pass?  Don&#039;t they add to the congestion and wear &amp; tear of the park roads?  Except in stop &amp; go driving that is seldom encountered driving on I-90, hybrids are still using gasoline and putting out greenhouse gasses.

Hybrids, except in urban settings, are not all that they&#039;ve been trumped up to be...unless all that one is attempting to achieve is self-perceived status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to partially disagree with your logic on this one.  There are several vehicles that get better fuel economy than any hybrid currently on the market.  In addition, why should hybrids get a free pass?  Don&#8217;t they add to the congestion and wear &amp; tear of the park roads?  Except in stop &amp; go driving that is seldom encountered driving on I-90, hybrids are still using gasoline and putting out greenhouse gasses.</p>
<p>Hybrids, except in urban settings, are not all that they&#8217;ve been trumped up to be&#8230;unless all that one is attempting to achieve is self-perceived status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

